Fuel Prices Putting Globalization in Reverse?
In tariff-equivalent terms, the explosion in global transport costs has effectively offset all the trade liberalization efforts of the last three decades. Not only does this suggest a major slowdown in the growth of world trade, but also a fundamental realignment in trade patterns.Rubin says that goods with a low value-to-freight ratio will be the most sensitive to rising transport costs. Heavy commodity items like steel that are not particularly labor intensive are the first to be hit. From a statement regarding the report:
Soaring transport costs, first on importing coal and iron to China and then exporting finished steel overseas, have more than eroded the wage advantage and suddenly rendered Chinese-made steel uncompetitive in the U.S. market. Underscoring this is the fact that China's steel exports to the U.S. are falling by more than 20 percent year over year, while U.S. domestic steel production has risen by almost 10 percent.Soaring transport costs suggest trade should be both "dampened" and "diverted" as markets seek shorter, and therefore less-costly, supply lines. "Instead of finding cheap labour halfway around the world, the key will be to find the cheapest labour force within reasonable shipping distance to your market," according to Rubin. In that type of world, Mexico's proximity to the rest of North America, combined with its labor costs, will give it a second chance to compete with Pacific Rim production, according to Rubin, who predicts that when oil prices reach US$200 a barrel, it will cost three times as much to ship the same container from China than from Mexico. Is all this giving too much credit to oil prices as the cause for elevated shipping costs? More to the point, do you think globalization is reversible? Resource Will Soaring Transport Costs Reverse Globalization? by Jeff Rubin and Benjamin Tal CIBC World Markets Inc., May 27, 2008